In this post we will apply the technique described in previous post to obtain modular equations of degree 3 and 5.
\displaystyle y = \frac{x(P^{2} + 2PQ + Q^{2}x^{2})}{P^{2} + 2PQx^{2} + Q^{2}x^{2}}
it is clear that the function y depends only on ratio Q/P and hence we can take P = 1 and Q = \alpha. Thus we have
\displaystyle y = \frac{x(1 + 2\alpha + \alpha^{2}x^{2})}{1 + 2\alpha x^{2} + \alpha^{2}x^{2}} = x\cdot \frac{(1 + 2\alpha) + \alpha^{2}x^{2}}{1 + \alpha(\alpha + 2)x^{2}}
The requirement of invariance under the transformation (x, y) \to (1/kx, 1/ly) leads to the following conditions
\displaystyle l = \frac{k^{3}}{\Delta^{2}}
and
\displaystyle (1 + 2\alpha)k^{2}x^{2} + \alpha^{2} = \Delta\{1 + \alpha(\alpha + 2)x^{2}\}
Thus we have the following equations
\displaystyle l = \frac{k^{3}}{\Delta^{2}}
\alpha^{2} = \Delta
k^{2}(2\alpha + 1) = \Delta \alpha(\alpha + 2)
and since 1/M = dy/dx at x = 0 we have M = 1/(2\alpha + 1). Clearly we have then
\displaystyle k^{2} = \frac{\alpha^{3}(2 + \alpha)}{2\alpha + 1},\,\, l^{2} = \alpha \left(\frac{2 + \alpha}{2\alpha + 1}\right)^{3}
Eliminating \alpha from the above equation is bit tricky. After some manipulations we have
\displaystyle k'^{2} = \frac{(1 - \alpha)(1 + \alpha)^{3}}{2\alpha + 1},\,\, l'^{2} = \frac{(1 + \alpha)(1 - \alpha)^{3}}{(2\alpha + 1)^{3}}
Clearly the pattern is now obvious if we multiply the expressions for k, l and (similarly for k', l')
\displaystyle \sqrt{kl} = \frac{\alpha(2 + \alpha)}{2\alpha + 1},\,\, \sqrt{k'l'} = \frac{1 - \alpha^{2}}{2\alpha + 1}
and thus we obtain the modular equation of degree 3:
\sqrt{kl} + \sqrt{k'l'} = 1.
Using the variable u = k^{1/4}, v = l^{1/4} we can obtain an expression devoid of algebraic irrationalities. Clearly we have \alpha^{4} = k^{3}/l so that \alpha = u^{3}/v and since \sqrt{kl} = \alpha(2 + \alpha)/(2\alpha + 1) it follows that u^{2}v^{2} = \alpha(2 + \alpha)/(2\alpha + 1). Putting the value of \alpha in this equation we get
\displaystyle u^{2}v^{2} = \dfrac{\dfrac{u^{3}}{v}\left(2 + \dfrac{u^{3}}{v}\right)}{\dfrac{2u^{3}}{v} + 1} = \frac{u^{3}(2v + u^{3})}{v(2u^{3} + v)}
\Rightarrow u(u^{3} + 2v) = v^{3}(2u^{3} + v)
and thus finally
u^{4} - v^{4} + 2uv(1 - u^{2}v^{2}) = 0
We have now
\displaystyle y = \frac{x(P^{2} + 2PQ + Q^{2}x^{2})}{P^{2} + 2PQx^{2} + Q^{2}x^{2}}
so that in this case
\displaystyle y = \frac{x\{(2\alpha + 1) + (2\alpha\beta + 2\beta + \alpha^{2})x^{2} + \beta^{2}x^{4}\}}{1 + (2\beta + 2\alpha + \alpha^{2})x^{2} + (\beta^{2} + 2\alpha\beta)x^{4}}
This relation is invariant under the transformation (x, y) \to (1/kx, 1/ly) so we have
\displaystyle l = \frac{k^{5}}{\Delta^{2}}\,\,\,\cdots (1)
\beta^{2} = \Delta\,\,\,\cdots (2)
k^{2}(2\alpha\beta + 2\beta + \alpha^{2}) = \Delta(2\beta + 2\alpha + \alpha^{2})\,\,\,\cdots (3)
k^{4}(2\alpha + 1) = \Delta(\beta^{2} + 2\alpha\beta)\,\,\,\cdots (4)
Like in the case of cubic transformation we have M = 1/(2\alpha + 1).
Obtaining a relation between k, l by eliminating \alpha, \beta, \Delta is reasonably cumbersome and it becomes manageable when we use the associated variables u = k^{1/4}, v = l^{1/4}. Using these variables and equations (1) and (2) we have \beta = \sqrt{\Delta} = u^{5}/v and putting these values in equation (4) we get
\displaystyle u^{16}(2\alpha + 1) = \frac{u^{10}}{v^{2}}\left(\frac{u^{10}}{v^{2}} + 2\alpha\cdot \frac{u^{5}}{v}\right)
or
(2\alpha + 1)uv^{4} = u^{5} + 2\alpha v \Rightarrow 2\alpha v(1 - uv^{3}) = u(v^{4} - u^{4})
\displaystyle \Rightarrow 2\alpha = \frac{u(v^{4} - u^{4})}{v(1 - uv^{3})}\,\,\,\cdots (5)
Again using equation (3) we get
\displaystyle (v^{2} - u^{2})(2\beta + \alpha^{2}) = u^{2}(1 - u^{3}v)(2\alpha) = \frac{u^{3}}{v}\frac{(v^{4} - u^{4})(1 - u^{3}v)}{1 - uv^{3}}
\displaystyle \Rightarrow 2\beta + \alpha^{2} = \frac{u^{3}}{v}\frac{(v^{2} + u^{2})(1 - u^{3}v)}{1 - uv^{3}}
\displaystyle \Rightarrow \alpha^{2} = \frac{u^{3}}{v}\left\{\frac{(v^{2} + u^{2})(1 - u^{3}v)}{1 - uv^{3}} - 2u^{2}\right\}
\displaystyle \Rightarrow \alpha^{2} = \frac{u^{3}}{v}\frac{(v^{2} - u^{2})(1 + u^{3}v)}{1 - uv^{3}}\,\,\,\cdots (6)
Dividing (6) by (5) we get
\displaystyle 2\alpha = \frac{4u^{2}(1 + u^{3}v)}{v^{2} + u^{2}}
Comparing this with (5) we get
4uv(1 - uv^{3})(1 + u^{3}v) - (v^{2} + u^{2})(v^{4} - u^{4}) = 0
and on simplifying further we have
u^{6} - v^{6} + 5u^{2}v^{2}(u^{2} - v^{2}) + 4uv(1 - u^{4}v^{4}) = 0
The reader must have understood by now that this technique of finding modular equations is quite unsuitable for larger values of p. In fact Jacobi treated only the cubic and quintic transformations in his Fundamenta Nova and Arthur Cayley extended this approach to p = 7 in his An Elementary Treatise on Elliptic Functions. Our exposition here is based on Cayley's book. For higher values of p Jacobi provided the transformation in a form which contains elliptic functions of K/p and thereby obtained equations L = K/(pM), L' = K'/M from which follows the relation L'/L = pK'/K. This we study in the next post.
Print/PDF Version
Cubic Transformation p = 3
Since we have p = 4\cdot 1 - 1, the degrees of P and Q are both 2\cdot 1 - 2 = 0 and hence they both are constants. Since\displaystyle y = \frac{x(P^{2} + 2PQ + Q^{2}x^{2})}{P^{2} + 2PQx^{2} + Q^{2}x^{2}}
it is clear that the function y depends only on ratio Q/P and hence we can take P = 1 and Q = \alpha. Thus we have
\displaystyle y = \frac{x(1 + 2\alpha + \alpha^{2}x^{2})}{1 + 2\alpha x^{2} + \alpha^{2}x^{2}} = x\cdot \frac{(1 + 2\alpha) + \alpha^{2}x^{2}}{1 + \alpha(\alpha + 2)x^{2}}
The requirement of invariance under the transformation (x, y) \to (1/kx, 1/ly) leads to the following conditions
\displaystyle l = \frac{k^{3}}{\Delta^{2}}
and
\displaystyle (1 + 2\alpha)k^{2}x^{2} + \alpha^{2} = \Delta\{1 + \alpha(\alpha + 2)x^{2}\}
Thus we have the following equations
\displaystyle l = \frac{k^{3}}{\Delta^{2}}
\alpha^{2} = \Delta
k^{2}(2\alpha + 1) = \Delta \alpha(\alpha + 2)
and since 1/M = dy/dx at x = 0 we have M = 1/(2\alpha + 1). Clearly we have then
\displaystyle k^{2} = \frac{\alpha^{3}(2 + \alpha)}{2\alpha + 1},\,\, l^{2} = \alpha \left(\frac{2 + \alpha}{2\alpha + 1}\right)^{3}
Eliminating \alpha from the above equation is bit tricky. After some manipulations we have
\displaystyle k'^{2} = \frac{(1 - \alpha)(1 + \alpha)^{3}}{2\alpha + 1},\,\, l'^{2} = \frac{(1 + \alpha)(1 - \alpha)^{3}}{(2\alpha + 1)^{3}}
Clearly the pattern is now obvious if we multiply the expressions for k, l and (similarly for k', l')
\displaystyle \sqrt{kl} = \frac{\alpha(2 + \alpha)}{2\alpha + 1},\,\, \sqrt{k'l'} = \frac{1 - \alpha^{2}}{2\alpha + 1}
and thus we obtain the modular equation of degree 3:
\sqrt{kl} + \sqrt{k'l'} = 1.
Using the variable u = k^{1/4}, v = l^{1/4} we can obtain an expression devoid of algebraic irrationalities. Clearly we have \alpha^{4} = k^{3}/l so that \alpha = u^{3}/v and since \sqrt{kl} = \alpha(2 + \alpha)/(2\alpha + 1) it follows that u^{2}v^{2} = \alpha(2 + \alpha)/(2\alpha + 1). Putting the value of \alpha in this equation we get
\displaystyle u^{2}v^{2} = \dfrac{\dfrac{u^{3}}{v}\left(2 + \dfrac{u^{3}}{v}\right)}{\dfrac{2u^{3}}{v} + 1} = \frac{u^{3}(2v + u^{3})}{v(2u^{3} + v)}
\Rightarrow u(u^{3} + 2v) = v^{3}(2u^{3} + v)
and thus finally
u^{4} - v^{4} + 2uv(1 - u^{2}v^{2}) = 0
Quintic Transformation p = 5
Here we have p = 5 = 4\cdot 1 + 1, hence the degree of P is 1 and that of Q is zero. Thus we can take P = 1 + \beta x^{2} and Q = \alpha (note that the degrees being talked of are degrees when P, Q are expressed as polynomials in x^{2}).We have now
\displaystyle y = \frac{x(P^{2} + 2PQ + Q^{2}x^{2})}{P^{2} + 2PQx^{2} + Q^{2}x^{2}}
so that in this case
\displaystyle y = \frac{x\{(2\alpha + 1) + (2\alpha\beta + 2\beta + \alpha^{2})x^{2} + \beta^{2}x^{4}\}}{1 + (2\beta + 2\alpha + \alpha^{2})x^{2} + (\beta^{2} + 2\alpha\beta)x^{4}}
This relation is invariant under the transformation (x, y) \to (1/kx, 1/ly) so we have
\displaystyle l = \frac{k^{5}}{\Delta^{2}}\,\,\,\cdots (1)
\beta^{2} = \Delta\,\,\,\cdots (2)
k^{2}(2\alpha\beta + 2\beta + \alpha^{2}) = \Delta(2\beta + 2\alpha + \alpha^{2})\,\,\,\cdots (3)
k^{4}(2\alpha + 1) = \Delta(\beta^{2} + 2\alpha\beta)\,\,\,\cdots (4)
Like in the case of cubic transformation we have M = 1/(2\alpha + 1).
Obtaining a relation between k, l by eliminating \alpha, \beta, \Delta is reasonably cumbersome and it becomes manageable when we use the associated variables u = k^{1/4}, v = l^{1/4}. Using these variables and equations (1) and (2) we have \beta = \sqrt{\Delta} = u^{5}/v and putting these values in equation (4) we get
\displaystyle u^{16}(2\alpha + 1) = \frac{u^{10}}{v^{2}}\left(\frac{u^{10}}{v^{2}} + 2\alpha\cdot \frac{u^{5}}{v}\right)
or
(2\alpha + 1)uv^{4} = u^{5} + 2\alpha v \Rightarrow 2\alpha v(1 - uv^{3}) = u(v^{4} - u^{4})
\displaystyle \Rightarrow 2\alpha = \frac{u(v^{4} - u^{4})}{v(1 - uv^{3})}\,\,\,\cdots (5)
Again using equation (3) we get
\displaystyle (v^{2} - u^{2})(2\beta + \alpha^{2}) = u^{2}(1 - u^{3}v)(2\alpha) = \frac{u^{3}}{v}\frac{(v^{4} - u^{4})(1 - u^{3}v)}{1 - uv^{3}}
\displaystyle \Rightarrow 2\beta + \alpha^{2} = \frac{u^{3}}{v}\frac{(v^{2} + u^{2})(1 - u^{3}v)}{1 - uv^{3}}
\displaystyle \Rightarrow \alpha^{2} = \frac{u^{3}}{v}\left\{\frac{(v^{2} + u^{2})(1 - u^{3}v)}{1 - uv^{3}} - 2u^{2}\right\}
\displaystyle \Rightarrow \alpha^{2} = \frac{u^{3}}{v}\frac{(v^{2} - u^{2})(1 + u^{3}v)}{1 - uv^{3}}\,\,\,\cdots (6)
Dividing (6) by (5) we get
\displaystyle 2\alpha = \frac{4u^{2}(1 + u^{3}v)}{v^{2} + u^{2}}
Comparing this with (5) we get
4uv(1 - uv^{3})(1 + u^{3}v) - (v^{2} + u^{2})(v^{4} - u^{4}) = 0
and on simplifying further we have
u^{6} - v^{6} + 5u^{2}v^{2}(u^{2} - v^{2}) + 4uv(1 - u^{4}v^{4}) = 0
The reader must have understood by now that this technique of finding modular equations is quite unsuitable for larger values of p. In fact Jacobi treated only the cubic and quintic transformations in his Fundamenta Nova and Arthur Cayley extended this approach to p = 7 in his An Elementary Treatise on Elliptic Functions. Our exposition here is based on Cayley's book. For higher values of p Jacobi provided the transformation in a form which contains elliptic functions of K/p and thereby obtained equations L = K/(pM), L' = K'/M from which follows the relation L'/L = pK'/K. This we study in the next post.
Print/PDF Version
0 comments :: Elementary Approach to Modular Equations: Jacobi's Transformation Theory 2
Post a Comment