Elementary Approach to Modular Equations: Jacobi's Transformation Theory 1

1 comment
To recapitulate the basics of elliptic integral theory (details here) we have K=K(k)=π/20dθ1k2sin2θ=10dx(1x2)(1k2x2) E=E(k)=π/201k2sin2θdθ=101k2x21x2dx
We have here 0k1 and the complementary modulus k=1k2 or in other words k2+k2=1. Also we denote K=K(k),E=E(k) and we have the Legendre's Identity KE+KEKK=π2

The Function K/K

From the definition it is clear that K is a strictly increasing function of k and moreover K as k1. Thus function K(k) maps interval [0,1) to [π/2,). Similarly E is strictly decreasing and maps [0,1] to [1,π/2]. Therefore it follows that K is a strictly decreasing function of k and E is a strictly increasing function of k.

From the above arguments it follows that the function K/K is a strictly decreasing function of k. When k0, K/K and as k1,K/K0. Thus the function K/K maps the interval (0,1) to the interval (0,). For any given positive number α we have a unique positive k(0,1) such that K/K=α. Let p be any positive number and then pα is also positive and therefore there is a unique number l(0,1) such that K(l)/K(l)=pα. We traditionally denote L=K(l),L=K(l). Therefore we can write LL=pα=pKK
Again let's think in the following way. Suppose a number k(0,1) and a positive number p is given. From k we can calculate K/K and hence pK/K corresponding to which there is a unique number l(0,1) such that L/L=pK/K. In this fashion l turns out to be a function of k. Therefore the equation L/L=pK/K determines l as a function of k which is one-one and invertible. From the continuity of K the function turns out to be continuous. To derive these results formally we need the fundamental formulas: dkdk=kk,dKdk=Ek2Kkk2,dEdk=EKk (for the proofs of these results read here)

Using these we have dKdk=dkdkdKdk=kkEk2Kk2k=k2KEkk2 and therefore ddk(KK)=KdKdkKdKdkK2=1K2(K(k2KE)kk2K(Ek2K)kk2)=KKKEKEkk2K2=π2kk2K2 Thus we have finally another fundamental relation ddk(KK)=π2kk2K2 which shows that K/K is strictly decreasing. On differentiating the equation L/L=pK/K we get dlll2L2=pdkkk2K2 or dldk=pll2kk2(LK)2 and therefore l is a strictly increasing function of k and maps (0,1) to (0,1). Also p<(=,>)1l>(=,<)k. We also see that the ratio L/K is a function of k,l and we traditionally call it the multiplier and denote by Mp(l,k). Thus we have pM2p(l,k)=p(LK)2=kk2ll2dldk Also it should be noted that if p<(=,>)1Mp(l,k)>(=,<)1.

Jacobi's Transformation Theory

Jacobi showed that the relation between l and k is algebraic when p is rational. First of all as an example we can take p=2. Then by Landen's transformation l=(1k)/(1+k)<k we see that L/L=2K/K. Clearly here the relation between l and k is algebraic and is also given by k=2l/(1+l). Also dldk=(1+k)(k/k)+(1k)(k/k)(1+k)2=2kk(1+k)2 and therefore 2M22(l,k)=kk2ll2dldk=kk21+k1k(1+k)24k2kk(1+k)2=k22(1+k)21k2 so that L/K=M2(l,k)=(1+k)/2=1/(1+l) as should have been the case.

Next let's understand that it is necessary only to study the case when p is a positive prime. For, if for positive prime p the relation L/L=pK/K is leading to an algebraic relation between l and k then we can show that the same kind of relation holds when p is any positive rational number. First suppose p is composite positive integer and p=p1p2 where both p1,p2 are primes. Then L/L=pK/K can be written L/L=p1Γ/Γ=p1(p2K/K). Since the relation between l,γ and γ,k is algebraic by assumption, the relation between l,k is algebraic. The same reasoning can be extended to the case when p is a product of any number of primes. Thus the case of positive integers is handled. In case of p=a/b where a,b are positive integers we can write L/L=pK/K as bL/L=aK/K=Γ/Γ. Since the relation between γ,k and γ,l is algebraic therefore the relation between k,l is algebraic.

So from now on let's assume that p is a positive prime. The algebraic relation between l,k implied by the equation L/L=pK/K is called a modular equation of degree p. The way Jacobi obtained these modular equations is related to the transformation of elliptic integrals. Consider the differential dy(1y2)(1l2y2) By suitable rational transformation y=f(x)/g(x) where f(x),g(x) are polynomials it is expected to reduce the differential to the form dxM(1x2)(1k2x2) Thus in effect we wish to establish a relation of the form Mdy(1y2)(1l2y2)=dx(1x2)(1k2x2) where y is a rational function of x and M is some constant. That such a transformation is possible is not so obvious. Jacobi started his Fundamenta Nova by describing this elegant theory of transformation and showed that such a transformation exists for every value of the positive prime p which is called the order of the transformation. In what follows we shall assume that p is an odd prime (p=2 is covered by the famous Landen Transformations).

The constant M is called multiplier and depends upon the values of l,k and is related to the multiplier Mp(l,k). To simplify the process of transformation the rational function y=U(x)/V(x) is chosen to be of very specific form. With the requirement that y vanishes with x we take y=xf(x)/g(x) where f(x),g(x) are polynomials of degrees (p1). Also f(x),g(x) are supposed to be even functions so that they are functions of x2 and then we can write y=xN(1,x2)D(1,x2) where N,D are homogeneous polynomials of degree (p1)/2. Another condition which we impose is that the relation between y and x does not change when (x,y) is replaced by (1/kx,1/ly). That this is possible needs to be demonstrated. First of all we can see that N(1,1k2x2)=(1kx)p1N(k2x2,1) We can next choose D(1,x2) such that N(k2x2,1)=ΔD(1,x2) where Δ is a constant. Thus the coefficients of D(1,x2) are same as those of N(1,x2), but in reverse order and multiplied by suitable powers of k. It thus follows that N(1,1k2x2)=Δ(1kx)p1D(1,x2) Replacing x by 1/kx we get N(1,x2)=Δxp1D(1,1k2x2) Multiplying the above two equations we get N(1,x2)N(1,1k2x2)=Δ2kp1D(1,x2)D(1,1k2x2) Now let's suppose that in the defining equation if we put 1/kx in place of x then the value of y changes to y1. Thus y1=1kxN(1,1k2x2)D(1,1k2x2)=1kxΔ2kp1D(1,x2)N(1,x2)=Δ2kpD(1,x2)xN(1,x2)=Δ2kp1y Clearly this reduces to 1/ly provided l=kp/Δ2.

Hence a transformation of the form y=U(x)/V(x) with U of degree p and V of degree (p1) with U being odd function and V being even function is possible which remains invariant under the change of variables (x,y)(1/kx,1/ly).

Next we would like to have further restrictions on the form of U and V. Putting y=U/V leads to dy=VUUVV2dx,(1y2)(1l2y2)=1V2(V2U2)(V2l2U2) and hence dy(1y2)(1l2y2)=VUUV(V2U2)(V2l2U2)dx If it is possible that V+U=(1+x)A2,VU=(1x)B2 for some polynomials A,B then we can see that 1+y=(1+x)A2/V,1y=(1x)B2/V and by invariance of relation between x and y under the transformation (x,y)(1/kx,1/ky) we can see that we must also have the relations 1+ly=(1+kx)C2/V,1ly=(1kx)D2/V or V+lU=(1+kx)C2,VlU=(1kx)D2 Now we can see that if (xα) is a factor of A then (xα)2 divides V+U and hence (xα) divides (V+U)UU(V+U)=VUUV. From the same logic it follows that A,B,C,D each divide VUUV and since the degrees of VUUV and ABCD are same (equal to (2p2)) it follows that the ratio ABCD/(VUUV) is a constant which we denote by M. Thus we arrive at Mdy(1y2)(1l2y2)=dx(1x2)(1k2x2) The idea is now to choose polynomials A,B in a suitable form. We keep A=P+Qx,B=PQx such that P,Q are even functions of x and the degree of P±Qx is (p1)/2. In general if p=(4n1) then the degrees of P,Q are (2n2) and if p=4n+1, degree of P is 2n and that of Q is (2n2).

Thus we arrive at the following transformation 1y1+y=1x1+x(PQx)2(P+Qx)2 so that y=x(P2+2PQ+Q2x2)P2+2PQx2+Q2x2 and then we obtain 1y=(1x)(PQx)2P2+2PQx2+Q2x21+y=(1+x)(P+Qx)2P2+2PQx2+Q2x21ly=(1kx)(PQx)2P2+2PQx2+Q2x21+ly=(1+kx)(P+Qx)2P2+2PQx2+Q2x2 The actual methodology of finding the polynomials U,V (or P,Q) would be dealt with in next post by showing examples with p=3 and p=5. From the theoretical investigation above it is clear that the process of finding these polynomials (i.e. their coefficients) is totally algebraical and hence the relation between k and l is algebraic (note that l=kp/Δ2, and that Δ itself would be an algebraic function of l,k). It should also be observed that the multiplier M is also an algebraical function of l and k (calculation of M is easy if we observe that 1/M=dy/dx at x=0).

Print/PDF Version

1 comment :: Elementary Approach to Modular Equations: Jacobi's Transformation Theory 1

Post a Comment

  1. y=x*f(x)/g(x) Why f(x),g(x) should be polynomials of degrees p-1?