π(PI) and the AGM: Introduction to Elliptic Integrals

Be the first to leave a comment!

Introduction

In my last post I had described the adventures of Gauss with AGM (in this post AGM means Arithmetic-Geometric Mean, see the linked post). Gauss had established the deep connection between Elliptic Integrals and AGM and used his results in this field to ultimately derive a formula for calculating π using AGM, but since it involved extraction of square roots it was not considered of much value in pre-computer era.

Instead formulas based on the power series expansion of tan1(x) given by tan1(x)=xx33+x55x77+ were used because these involved the basic operations of arithmetic namely addition, subtraction, multiplication and division. An example of such a formula is π4=4tan1(15)tan1(1239) Gauss' AGM formula for π was rediscovered in 1976 independently by Richard P. Brent and Eugene Salamin and forms the topic of this series of posts.

The formula combines many interesting results from the theory of elliptic integrals namely
  1. Elliptic Integrals of first and second kind
  2. Legendre's Identity: relation of elliptic integrals with π
  3. Calculation of elliptic integrals using AGM
These topics will be discussed one by one in this series of posts starting with basics of theory of elliptic integrals.

Elliptic Integrals

The theory of elliptic integrals was developed to handle certain integrals which were not expressible in terms of elementary functions. These integrals were obtained while calculating arc-lengths of curves like ellipses (that's why the name elliptic is used) and lemniscate. Since they were not expressible in terms of elementary functions, mathematicians started studying the integrals directly and later Abel inverted them to obtain the elliptic functions.

To begin with the elliptic integral of first kind is defined by F(ϕ,k)=ϕ0dθ1k2sin2θ where ϕ is called the amplitude and k is called the modulus. In some texts the quantity m=k2 , called the parameter (or even modulus), is used and then the integral is denoted by F(ϕ|m). Using the substitution t=sinθ and x=sinϕ the integral can be expressed in the algebraic form as follows F(x;k)=x0dt(1t2)(1k2t2) Defined as above these integrals are called incomplete because of the variable ϕ or x being used. By setting ϕ=π/2 or equivalently x=1 one obtains the the complete elliptic integral of first kind denoted by K(k) K(k)=π/20dθ1k2sin2θ=10dt(1t2)(1k2t2) A slightly symmetrical form of the elliptic integral of first kind is also used extensively. This is defined as I(ϕ,a,b)=ϕ0dθa2cos2θ+b2sin2θ and the complete integral is defined by I(a,b)=π/20dθa2cos2θ+b2sin2θ The relation between the symmetric and non-symmetric forms is immediately obvious I(ϕ,a,b)=1aF(ϕ,k),k2=1b2a2 In the theory of elliptic integrals the complementary modulus k is used frequently and is related to the modulus k as follows k2+k2=1 The elliptic integral of second kind is defined by E(ϕ,k)=ϕ01k2sin2θdθ with the algebraic form being given by E(x;k)=x01k2t21t2dt The complete elliptic integral of second kind is defined by E(k)=π/201k2sin2θdθ=101k2t21t2dt The symmetric forms are defined in a similar fashion as J(ϕ,a,b)=ϕ0a2cos2θ+b2sin2θdθ J(a,b)=π/20a2cos2θ+b2sin2θdθ The relation with non-symmetric forms is as follows J(ϕ,a,b)=aE(ϕ,k),k2=1b2a2 This preliminary discussion involving the definition of elliptic integrals concludes the first post in this series. The next post discusses the Legendre's Identity connecting these integrals with π.

Print/PDF Version

0 comments :: π(PI) and the AGM: Introduction to Elliptic Integrals

Post a Comment