Evaluation of R(e−2π/5)
In the last post we established the transformation formula [[√5+12]5+R5(e−2α)][[√5+12]5+R5(e−2β)]=5√5[√5+12]5 under the condition αβ=π2/5.If we put α=π then β=π/5 and since we already know the value of R(e−2π) we can use equation (1) to evaluate R(e−2π/5). But in order to do that we need to calculate R5(e−2π) first.
We have from an earlier post R(e−2π)=√5+√52−√5+12 Directly raising this to 5th power is bit cumbersome and hence we follow another simpler approach. We note that the value x=R(e−2π) is a root of the equation x2+(√5+1)x−1=0 and it is the greater root of the equation. We propose to find the equation whose roots are 5th powers of the roots of equation (2). Let a,b be roots of equation (2) with a>b so that a=R(e−2π). Then a+b=−(√5+1),ab=−1. It follows that a5b5=−1. What we require now is the sum a5+b5. To do this let Σi=ai+bi. Then we know that Σ0=2,Σ1=−(√5+1).
From equation (2) we can see that Σ2+(√5+1)Σ1−Σ0=0 so that Σ2=2+(√5+1)2=8+2√5 Again Σ3+(√5+1)Σ2−Σ1=0 and therefore Σ3=Σ1−(√5+1)Σ2=−(√5+1)−(√5+1)(8+2√5)=−(√5+1)(9+2√5)=−(19+11√5) Similarly Σ4=Σ2−(√5+1)Σ3=8+2√5+(√5+1)(19+11√5)=82+32√5 and Σ5=Σ3−(√5+1)Σ4=−(19+11√5)−(√5+1)(82+32√5)=−(19+11√5)−(242+114√5)=−(261+125√5) Hence it follows that a5,b5 are roots of the equation x2+(261+125√5)x−1=0 and therefore R5(e−2π)=a5=−(261+125√5)+√146250+65250√52=√125(585+261√5)2−261+125√52=15√5(65+29√5)2−261+125√52 and therefore R5(e−2π)+(√5+12)5=15√5(65+29√5)2−261+125√52+11+5√52=15√5(65+29√5)2−5(25+12√5)=5√5(3√65+29√52−(12+5√5)) Using the above calculation in equation (1) and setting α=π,β=π/5 we get (√5+12)5+R5(e−2π/5)=(√5+12)53√65+29√52−(12+5√5)=(√5+12)5(3√65+29√52+(12+5√5))47+21√52=(√5+12)5(3√85−38√5+39−17√52)=3√(85−38√5)⋅(11+5√52)2+39−17√52⋅11+5√52=3√5+√52+1+2√5 so that R5(e−2π/5)=3√5+√52+1+2√5−11+5√52=3√5+√52−9+√52 and then R(e−2π/5)=(3√5+√52−9+√52)1/5
In a similar manner using equation (12) of last post we can show that S(e−π/5)=(3√5−√52+9−√52)1/5
Evaluation of R(e−4π)
We next evaluate R(e−4π) using the values of some class invariants. The first such evaluation for R(q) was done by Ramanathan which was later simplified by Bruce C. Berndt. We follow the approach suggested by Berndt.Let x=R(e−4π) so that x satisfies the equation 1x−1−x=e4π/5⋅f(−e−4π/5)f(−e−20π)=A We next turn to the evaluation of constant A defined above. Clearly we know that if η(q)=q1/12f(−q2) then η(e−π/√n)=n1/4η(e−π√n) Putting n=25/4 we get η(e−2π/5)=√52η(e−5π/2)⇒e−π/30f(−e−4π/5)=√52e−5π/24f(−e−5π)⇒f(−e−4π/5)=√52e−7π/40f(−e−5π) and hence the constant A defined above can be written as A=√52e5π/8f(−e−5π)f(−e−20π)=√52e5π/8f(−q)f(−q4)=√52e5π/8(q;q)∞(q4;q4)∞=√52e5π/8(q;q2)∞(q2;q4)∞=√52e5π/8⋅21/4q1/24g(q)⋅21/4q1/12g(q2)=51/2e5π/8q1/8g(q)g(q2)=√5g25g100 where q=e−5π.
Using equations (13) and (14) of this post and setting x=4√5 we get A=√5(1+√5)3/2(3+24√5)1/22√2=√5(√5+1)(√5−1)(1+√5)1/2(3+24√5)1/22√2(√5−1)=√5√2√5−1{(1+√5)(3+24√5)}1/2=√5√5−1{2(1+x2)(3+2x)}1/2=√5√5−1{6+4x+6x2+4x3}1/2=√5√5−1{1+4x+6x2+4x3+x4}1/2=√5x2−1{(1+x)4}1/2=√5x+1x−1=√54√5+14√5−1 It now follows that x=R(e−4π) is given by x=√a2+1−a where a is given by 2a=1+A=1+√54√5+14√5−1
General Value of R(e−π√n)
If q=e−π√n where n is a positive rational, then we know that the value of k=k(q)=θ22(q)/θ23(q) is an algebraic number. Now let l=k(q5) be the modulus corresponding to q5 so that l is also an algebraic number. Using notation of Ramanujan we set α=k2,β=l2 so that β is of degree 5 over α. From the transcription formulas in this post we have f6(−q)qf6(−q5)=2−1z3(q)(1−α)α1/4q−1/4q⋅2−1z3(q5)(1−β)β1/4q−5/4=m3(1−α)α1/4(1−β)β1/4 Since the multiplier m itself can be expressed as an algebraic function of α,β it follows from the above that the fraction f6(−q)/{qf6(−q5)} is an algebraic number provided that q=e−π√n, n being a positive rational number. And therefore from the identity 1R5(q)−11−R5(q)=f6(−q)qf6(−q5) it follows that R5(q) and hence R(q) is also an algebraic number.Using sophisticated techniques of modular forms and class field theory it can be established that the fraction f6(−q)/{qf6(−q5)} is an algebraic integer in which case the above identity for R(q) implies that R(q) is a unit whenever q=e−π√n, n being a positive rational. The same proposition holds for the values of S(q)=−R(−q) and can be established in exactly the same manner as done for R(q).
Following Dr. Bruce C. Berndt we will now establish some general formulas for R(e−2π√n) in terms of the class invariants. Let us then suppose that q=e−2π√n and then we can define a constant A by A=f(−q)q1/6f(−q5)=eπ√n/3f(−e−2π√n)f(−e−10π√n) so that 1R5(q)−11−R5(q)=A6 and then R5(e−2π√n)=√a2+1−a where 2a=A6+11
To calculate the value of A we need to make use of modular equations of degree 5 established in an earlier post. We have from equations (19) and (20) of this post: m=(βα)1/4+(1−β1−α)1/4−(β(1−β)α(1−α))1/4 5m=(αβ)1/4+(1−α1−β)1/4−(α(1−α)β(1−β))1/4 From the above equations we can see that {α(1−α)}1/4(m+(β(1−β)α(1−α))1/4)={β(1−β)}1/4(5m+(α(1−α)β(1−β))1/4) Now let q correspond to α so that q5 corresponds to β and m=ϕ2(q)/ϕ2(q5). We then have q−1/24χ(q)=21/6{α(1−α)}−1/24 q−5/24χ(q5)=21/6{β(1−β)}−1/24 and thus the equation (7) above can be transcribed into the following identity for theta functions 2q1/4χ6(q)(ϕ2(q)ϕ2(q5)+qχ6(q)χ6(q5))=2q5/4χ6(q5)(5ϕ2(q5)ϕ2(q)+χ6(q5)qχ6(q)) which leads to ϕ2(q)ϕ2(q5)−5qϕ2(q5)χ6(q)ϕ2(q)χ6(q5)=1−qχ6(q)χ6(q5)
Noting that f(−q2)=(q2;q2)∞=(−q;q2)∞(−q;q2)∞(q2;q2)∞(−q;q2)∞(−q;q2)∞=f(q,q)χ2(q)=ϕ(q)χ2(q) we can write ϕ(q)=χ2(q)f(−q2) and then the equation (8) is transformed into χ4(q)f2(−q2)χ4(q5)f2(−q10)−5qf2(−q10)χ2(q)f2(−q2)χ2(q5)=1−qχ6(q)χ6(q5)
Next we know that the Ramanujan class invariant function G(q) is given by G(q)=2−1/4q−1/24χ(q) so that χ(q)=21/4q1/24G(q). Using this value of χ(q) in above equation we get G4(q)f2(−q2)q2/3G4(q5)f2(−q10)−5q2/3G2(q)f2(−q10)G2(q5)f2(−q2)=1−G6(q)G6(q5)
Putting q=e−π√n in the above equation and noting that G(q)=Gn,G(q5)=G25n and also observing that A=q−1/3f(−q2)/f(−q10), we finally get A2G4nG425n−A−2G2nG225n=1−G6nG625n Setting U=G25n/Gn we can see that the above equation is transformed into A2U−5UA2=U3−1U3 If we replace q by −q in the equation (9) and set V=g25n/gn then we get A2V+5VA2=V3+1V3
We can now summarize our formulas as follows:
Let n be a positive rational number and we define U=G25nGn,V=g25ngn Then the constant A defined by A=eπ√n/3f(−e−2π√n)f(−e−10π√n) satisfies the following equations A2U−5UA2=U3−1U3 A2V+5VA2=V3+1V3 and the value of R5(e−2π√n) is given by R5(e−2π√n)=√a2+1−a where a is given by 2a=A6+11 If we put n=1/5 in the above formula we get U=1 so that A2=√5 and a=(11+5√5)/2 and the value of R5(e−2π/√5) calculated using above formula matches the value calculated earlier.
There are analogous results for S(q) which the reader can formulate and prove himself along the above lines. For more such formulas the reader should consult Dr. Bruce C. Berndt's papers and his Ramanujan's Notebooks.
Print/PDF Version
0 comments :: Values of Rogers-Ramanujan Continued Fraction: Part 3
Post a Comment