Elementary Approach to Modular Equations: Jacobi's Transformation Theory 2

Be the first to leave a comment!
In this post we will apply the technique described in previous post to obtain modular equations of degree 3 and 5.

Cubic Transformation p=3

Since we have p=411, the degrees of P and Q are both 212=0 and hence they both are constants. Since
y=x(P2+2PQ+Q2x2)P2+2PQx2+Q2x2
it is clear that the function y depends only on ratio Q/P and hence we can take P=1 and Q=α. Thus we have
y=x(1+2α+α2x2)1+2αx2+α2x2=x(1+2α)+α2x21+α(α+2)x2

The requirement of invariance under the transformation (x,y)(1/kx,1/ly) leads to the following conditions
l=k3Δ2
and
(1+2α)k2x2+α2=Δ{1+α(α+2)x2}

Thus we have the following equations
l=k3Δ2
α2=Δ
k2(2α+1)=Δα(α+2)
and since 1/M=dy/dx at x=0 we have M=1/(2α+1). Clearly we have then
k2=α3(2+α)2α+1,l2=α(2+α2α+1)3

Eliminating α from the above equation is bit tricky. After some manipulations we have
k2=(1α)(1+α)32α+1,l2=(1+α)(1α)3(2α+1)3

Clearly the pattern is now obvious if we multiply the expressions for k,l and (similarly for k,l)
kl=α(2+α)2α+1,kl=1α22α+1
and thus we obtain the modular equation of degree 3:
kl+kl=1.

Using the variable u=k1/4,v=l1/4 we can obtain an expression devoid of algebraic irrationalities. Clearly we have α4=k3/l so that α=u3/v and since kl=α(2+α)/(2α+1) it follows that u2v2=α(2+α)/(2α+1). Putting the value of α in this equation we get
u2v2=u3v(2+u3v)2u3v+1=u3(2v+u3)v(2u3+v)
u(u3+2v)=v3(2u3+v)
and thus finally
u4v4+2uv(1u2v2)=0

Quintic Transformation p=5

Here we have p=5=41+1, hence the degree of P is 1 and that of Q is zero. Thus we can take P=1+βx2 and Q=α (note that the degrees being talked of are degrees when P,Q are expressed as polynomials in x2).

We have now
y=x(P2+2PQ+Q2x2)P2+2PQx2+Q2x2
so that in this case
y=x{(2α+1)+(2αβ+2β+α2)x2+β2x4}1+(2β+2α+α2)x2+(β2+2αβ)x4

This relation is invariant under the transformation (x,y)(1/kx,1/ly) so we have
l=k5Δ2(1)
β2=Δ(2)
k2(2αβ+2β+α2)=Δ(2β+2α+α2)(3)
k4(2α+1)=Δ(β2+2αβ)(4)

Like in the case of cubic transformation we have M=1/(2α+1).

Obtaining a relation between k,l by eliminating α,β,Δ is reasonably cumbersome and it becomes manageable when we use the associated variables u=k1/4,v=l1/4. Using these variables and equations (1) and (2) we have β=Δ=u5/v and putting these values in equation (4) we get
u16(2α+1)=u10v2(u10v2+2αu5v)
or
(2α+1)uv4=u5+2αv2αv(1uv3)=u(v4u4)
2α=u(v4u4)v(1uv3)(5)

Again using equation (3) we get
(v2u2)(2β+α2)=u2(1u3v)(2α)=u3v(v4u4)(1u3v)1uv3
2β+α2=u3v(v2+u2)(1u3v)1uv3
α2=u3v{(v2+u2)(1u3v)1uv32u2}
α2=u3v(v2u2)(1+u3v)1uv3(6)

Dividing (6) by (5) we get
2α=4u2(1+u3v)v2+u2
Comparing this with (5) we get
4uv(1uv3)(1+u3v)(v2+u2)(v4u4)=0
and on simplifying further we have
u6v6+5u2v2(u2v2)+4uv(1u4v4)=0

The reader must have understood by now that this technique of finding modular equations is quite unsuitable for larger values of p. In fact Jacobi treated only the cubic and quintic transformations in his Fundamenta Nova and Arthur Cayley extended this approach to p=7 in his An Elementary Treatise on Elliptic Functions. Our exposition here is based on Cayley's book. For higher values of p Jacobi provided the transformation in a form which contains elliptic functions of K/p and thereby obtained equations L=K/(pM),L=K/M from which follows the relation L/L=pK/K. This we study in the next post.

Print/PDF Version

0 comments :: Elementary Approach to Modular Equations: Jacobi's Transformation Theory 2

Post a Comment