In the last post we used the multiplication by n! trick to prove that e is not a quadratic irrationality. In this post we will use same technique albeit in a direct fashion to show that e2 is irrational.
From the above we can see that LHS is an integer and S is also an integer, thereby implying that the second sum on RHS (b⋅R) is an integer. However this second sum is not bounded (because of large powers of 2 involved). In fact we can see that R=2n+1n+1+2n+2(n+1)(n+2)+⋯=2n+1(1n+1+2(n+1)(n+2)+⋯)<2n+1(1n+1+2(n+1)2+22(n+1)3+⋯)=2n+1⋅1n+11−2n+1=2n+1n−1 The above derivation is valid if n>1 (because in summing an infinite GP we need common ratio 2/(n+1)<1). We thus have 2n+1n+1<R<2n+1n−1 Now we need to analyze the sum S. We have S=n!(1+21!+222!+⋯+2nn!)=k=n∑k=02k⋅n!k! We need to analyze the highest power of 2 in each term 2k⋅n!/k!. Clearly the highest power of 2 in n! is given by [n2]+[n22]+⋯≤n2+n22+⋯=n Hence the highest power of 2 in n! is at most n. In fact the highest such power occurs when n itself is a power of 2 and each of n/2r is integral. Let us then take n=2m and then highest power of 2 in n!=(2m)! is given by [2m2]+[2m22]+⋯=2m−1+2m−2+⋯+2+1=2m−1=n−1 From now on we keep n always as power of 2 i.e. n=2m. Then the highest power of 2 in term 2k⋅n!/k! is at least k+n−1−k=n−1. It follows now that sum S is an integer divisible by 2n−1. Similarly n!a is also divisible by 2n−1. Thus dividing equation (1) by 2n−1 we get n!a2n−1=b⋅S2n−1+b⋅R2n−1A=b.S′+bR′ where A and S′ are integers and R′=R/(2n−1) and bR′ is also an integer because of the above equation.
We have earlier proved that 2n+1n+1<R<2n+1n−1 and therefore 0<4bn+1<bR2n−1<4bn−1⇒0<bR′<4bn−1<1 provided n>4b+1 and n a power of 2 say n=2m. It now follows that we can choose a suitable value of n such that 0<bR′<1 and hence bR′ is not an integer. This is the contradiction we needed to achieve and this proves that e2 is irrational.
Note: This proof has been taken from a paper "New Proofs of Irrationality of e2 and e4" by John B. Cosgrave. The basic idea of dividing by 2n−1 is by Liouville.
Aigner and Ziegler carry on this idea a little forward in their book "Proofs from the BOOK" and show that e4 is irrational. This we present below.
b(n!e2)=a(n!e−2) As shown earlier n!e2 can be expressed n!e2=S1+R1 where S1 is an integer divisible by 2n−1 and R1=2n+1n+1+2n+2(n+1)(n+2)+⋯<2n+1n+1+2n+2(n+1)2+⋯=2n+1n−1 Similarly we can write n!e−2=S2+R2 where S2 is an integer divisible by 2n−1 and R2=(−1)n+1(2n+1n+1−2n+2(n+1)(n+2)+⋯) Since n is even it follows that R2<0 and |R2|<2n+1n+1 We can now divide equation (3) by 2n−1 to arrive at: b(S12n−1+R12n−1)=a(S22n−1+R22n−1)⇒bB+bR12n−1=aA+aR22n−1⇒bB+B′=aA+A′ where 0<B′<4b/(n−1) and −4a/(n+1)<A′<0 and A,B are integers. For large values of n=2m we see an obvious contradiction as the LHS of the last equation (4) is slightly larger than an integer and RHS of the equation is slightly less than an integer.
The same argument can be used to prove that e2 is not a quadratic irrational. Since this post has grown considerably in length, we postpone this proof to the next post.
Print/PDF Version
Proof that e2 is Irrational
We know that e2=1+211!+222!+⋯+2nn!+2n+1(n+1)!+⋯ and hence if we assume that e2 is rational say a/b where a,b are positive integers, then we see that n!a=n!be2=n!b(1+211!+222!+⋯+2nn!)+b(2n+1n+1+2n+2(n+1)(n+2)+⋯)⇒n!a=b⋅S+b⋅R where S and R denote first and seconds sums respectively in brackets on the RHS.From the above we can see that LHS is an integer and S is also an integer, thereby implying that the second sum on RHS (b⋅R) is an integer. However this second sum is not bounded (because of large powers of 2 involved). In fact we can see that R=2n+1n+1+2n+2(n+1)(n+2)+⋯=2n+1(1n+1+2(n+1)(n+2)+⋯)<2n+1(1n+1+2(n+1)2+22(n+1)3+⋯)=2n+1⋅1n+11−2n+1=2n+1n−1 The above derivation is valid if n>1 (because in summing an infinite GP we need common ratio 2/(n+1)<1). We thus have 2n+1n+1<R<2n+1n−1 Now we need to analyze the sum S. We have S=n!(1+21!+222!+⋯+2nn!)=k=n∑k=02k⋅n!k! We need to analyze the highest power of 2 in each term 2k⋅n!/k!. Clearly the highest power of 2 in n! is given by [n2]+[n22]+⋯≤n2+n22+⋯=n Hence the highest power of 2 in n! is at most n. In fact the highest such power occurs when n itself is a power of 2 and each of n/2r is integral. Let us then take n=2m and then highest power of 2 in n!=(2m)! is given by [2m2]+[2m22]+⋯=2m−1+2m−2+⋯+2+1=2m−1=n−1 From now on we keep n always as power of 2 i.e. n=2m. Then the highest power of 2 in term 2k⋅n!/k! is at least k+n−1−k=n−1. It follows now that sum S is an integer divisible by 2n−1. Similarly n!a is also divisible by 2n−1. Thus dividing equation (1) by 2n−1 we get n!a2n−1=b⋅S2n−1+b⋅R2n−1A=b.S′+bR′ where A and S′ are integers and R′=R/(2n−1) and bR′ is also an integer because of the above equation.
We have earlier proved that 2n+1n+1<R<2n+1n−1 and therefore 0<4bn+1<bR2n−1<4bn−1⇒0<bR′<4bn−1<1 provided n>4b+1 and n a power of 2 say n=2m. It now follows that we can choose a suitable value of n such that 0<bR′<1 and hence bR′ is not an integer. This is the contradiction we needed to achieve and this proves that e2 is irrational.
Note: This proof has been taken from a paper "New Proofs of Irrationality of e2 and e4" by John B. Cosgrave. The basic idea of dividing by 2n−1 is by Liouville.
Aigner and Ziegler carry on this idea a little forward in their book "Proofs from the BOOK" and show that e4 is irrational. This we present below.
Proof that e4 is Irrational
Let us assume on the contrary that e4=a/b where a,b are positive integers. This means that be2=ae−2. Multiplying the equation by n! (where n is some power of 2, say n=2m) we get:b(n!e2)=a(n!e−2) As shown earlier n!e2 can be expressed n!e2=S1+R1 where S1 is an integer divisible by 2n−1 and R1=2n+1n+1+2n+2(n+1)(n+2)+⋯<2n+1n+1+2n+2(n+1)2+⋯=2n+1n−1 Similarly we can write n!e−2=S2+R2 where S2 is an integer divisible by 2n−1 and R2=(−1)n+1(2n+1n+1−2n+2(n+1)(n+2)+⋯) Since n is even it follows that R2<0 and |R2|<2n+1n+1 We can now divide equation (3) by 2n−1 to arrive at: b(S12n−1+R12n−1)=a(S22n−1+R22n−1)⇒bB+bR12n−1=aA+aR22n−1⇒bB+B′=aA+A′ where 0<B′<4b/(n−1) and −4a/(n+1)<A′<0 and A,B are integers. For large values of n=2m we see an obvious contradiction as the LHS of the last equation (4) is slightly larger than an integer and RHS of the equation is slightly less than an integer.
The same argument can be used to prove that e2 is not a quadratic irrational. Since this post has grown considerably in length, we postpone this proof to the next post.
Print/PDF Version
0 comments :: Another Proof that e squared is Irrational
Post a Comment